My friend Melissa's museum was reviewed in the New York Times, which makes me eager to visit it the next time I'm in Denver.
However, the review also makes me wonder whether it's possible to work at the Times and not be a raging snob. Check out the first three paragraphs:
"An East Coast visitor’s first reaction, provincially enough, has to be skepticism: does Colorado even have that much history?
Enough history to justify a $110 million museum — the History Colorado Center — which is opening on Saturday, with plans for 40,000 square feet of exhibitions costing an additional $33 million, state-of-the-art technological displays, a research center and archival storage for over 15 million items, including more than 750,000 photographs and 200,000 artifacts?
The state is under 140 years old, and even if you include the ancient cliff dwellings preserved in Mesa Verde National Park, there is little documented history before the incursion of outsiders in the 18th century."
I think Erik Loomis captures the ridiculousness of this review pretty well, when he writes: "Well, thank you Mr. East Coast Elite for giving your seal of approval that a state like Colorado has History! As a native of Oregon, will you please fly out to Portland and tell us whether we have enough history so I can know whether to write my book or not?"